Skip to content
Voltarum OpenWRT buyers guide

Cudy TR3000 vs GL.iNet Beryl AX

Side-by-side facts with the differences marked. A spec advantage is not a verdict: what matters depends on your connection, your space and what you run on the router.

Specifications of Cudy TR3000 (TR3000 v1) and GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000)
Factual dataCudy TR3000 (TR3000 v1)
Recommended
GL.iNet Beryl AX (GL-MT3000)
Highly Recommended
OpenWrt
SupportFully supportedFully supported
StatusCurrent stable releaseCurrent stable release
Supported since23.05.423.05.0
Latest release25.12.625.12.6
InstallationHardEasyeasier
Warnings
  • Difficult installation
  • Hardware revision warning
None
Hardware
SoCMediaTek MT7981B (Filogic 820)MediaTek MT7981B (Filogic 820)
ArchitectureARM 64-bit (aarch64)ARM 64-bit (aarch64)
CPU2 cores @ 1.3 GHz2 cores @ 1.3 GHz
RAM512 MB512 MB
Flash128 MB256 MBmore flash
USB1× USB 3.01× USB 3.0
Network
Fastest port2.5 GbE2.5 GbE
Multi-gig ports1× 2.5 GbE1× 2.5 GbE
Ethernet ports22
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 · AX3000 · 2.4 / 5 GHzWi-Fi 6 · AX3000 · 2.4 / 5 GHz
Max wireless (theoretical)3.0 Gbps3.0 Gbps
VLANYesYes
Suitability (our estimate)
WireGuardGoodGood
OpenVPNFairFair
SQMGoodGood
Travel routerYesYes
Editorial
Overall score7.68.8
Typical price~$70~$89
Where to buyRetailers →Retailers →

▲ marks the router with the advantage on that line. Prices are editorial references, not live prices.

Editorial opinionOur take

Almost the same hardware. The Cudy is cheaper; the GL.iNet installs OpenWrt from its web interface and recovers easily. If you have never used a serial console, pay the difference for the Beryl AX.

← Compare other routers